# ACIN Oversight and Governance Board The **ACIN Oversight and Governance Board** is the body ACIN documents assign responsibility for policy, budgets, access, audits, privacy, expansion, disputes, and system governance. The final package supplies proposed bylaws, a kickoff packet, MOU provisions, a cooperation-agreement draft, and a controlled-repository index—but no authoritative roster, executed interlocal instrument, meeting minutes, or vote record. ## Roles in this corpus - The MOU gives one equal vote to each RMS-contributing agency and places the Sixth Judicial District Prosecuting Attorney in the chair for grant compliance ([[ACIN Agreements and Participation Terms]], `AGR-201_El_Dorado_PD_MOU_EXECUTED_2026-05-15.pdf`, p. 2). - The January manual describes quarterly meetings, recorded minutes, policy votes, access approvals, audits, and fixed eleven-member bylaws ([[ACIN Policy and Operations Manual]], `POL-301_ACIN_Policy_and_Operations_Manual_REDACTED_2026-01.pdf`, pp. 11-12, 70-75). - The April kickoff packet calls the initial representatives informal and nonvoting and targets formal governance after an interlocal transition ([[ACIN Governance Board and Controlled Repository]], `GOV-102_ACIN_Governance_Board_Kickoff_Packet_2026-04.pdf`, pp. 3-8). - The June repository index calls the board ACIN's approval authority (`GOV-003_Master_Controlled_Repository_Index_BOARD_READY.pdf`, pp. 1-3). > [!contradiction] Approval and composition remain unresolved > The January approval claim, April informal/future-board account, MOU per-RMS model, draft per-participant model, kickoff per-data-agency model, and eleven-member bylaws do not identify one controlling board. See [[T031 - ACIN Board Approval Claims vs Future Formal Governance]]. ## Notes The produced records establish the powers ACIN intended a board to exercise. They do not establish which body exercised them, with what membership and authority, on each relevant date.