# Pulaski County Attorney's Office The legal office of [[Pulaski County]] government. On the County's standard Contract Approval Routing form, the County Attorney is the fifth signature in the chain — confirming legal review of the contract before it reaches the [[Pulaski County Judge's Office|Judge's]] desk for executive signature. For the surveillance investigation, the County Attorney's signature appears on every contract routing form in the production. The County Attorney's substantive review work product (legal opinions, memoranda) is not separately surfaced in the production, but the signature acknowledges that the standard County legal-review process was completed for both the [[Pulaski County Flock Safety Term Contract Award (Contract 6764)|Flock Award Letter]] and the [[Pulaski County Flock Safety MSA and Order Form (Contract 6764)|Flock MSA]]. ## People (No identified individual; the office's personnel are not surfaced in the production beyond the signature space on the routing form.) ## Roles in this corpus - **Legal review of vendor contracts.** The County Attorney's signature on the August 2023 Flock Term Contract Award and the October 2023 Flock MSA Routing form indicates that the Office reviewed and approved the contract documents from a legal perspective before they were signed by Judge Hyde. - **Review of the included A.C.A. § 27-52-110 statute reference.** The [[A.C.A. § 27-52-110 — County Automated Enforcement Device Statute]] Westlaw printout was included in the Flock contract file — likely by the County Attorney's Office in the course of contract review. The statute is the County-government-specific Arkansas restriction on automated enforcement devices; its inclusion in the contract file suggests Attorney's Office consideration of whether and how it applies. The Office's substantive analysis is not in the corpus. - **Possible counterparty for the October 2023 Flock MSA negotiation.** [[Tashika Keown]]'s October 3, 2023 message to [[Philip Nanni]] specified: *"If Flock Safety requires a signed contract, let me know and I will forward to legal for signature."* — implying that the County Attorney's office is the internal "legal" reviewer of contracts at the signing stage. Whether the substantive red-line edits in October 2023 were drafted by the County Attorney's Office or by Purchasing is not separately documented. ## Notes - The corpus does not contain the County Attorney's Office's substantive legal-opinion work on: - Whether Flock's standard MSA terms (data-anonymization license, broad disclosure-of-footage clause, vendor-favorable limitation of liability) were modified per County Attorney recommendations - Whether [[A.C.A. § 27-52-110 — County Automated Enforcement Device Statute|§ 27-52-110]] applies to Flock Falcon cameras - Whether PCSO's 30-day retention period under the Flock MSA complies with both § 27-52-110(e) and [[Arkansas Automatic License Plate Reader System Act|§ 12-12-1808]] (the ALPR Act's 150-day cap) - The County's procurement-rules authorization threshold above which Quorum Court action would have been required A targeted FOIA to the County Attorney's Office for any legal memoranda about ALPR procurement would yield this content if it exists. - The County Attorney's Office is structurally distinct from the [[Pulaski County Sheriff's Office]]'s legal advisors. PCSO presumably has its own legal counsel for law-enforcement-operations matters, while the County Attorney represents the County government in its contracting and civil matters.