# Kristin Knox Records / NextRequest staff handler at the [[Pulaski County Sheriff's Office]]. Knox is the authoring voice on every substantive portal message in PCSO's response to FOIA request `#26-808`: the May 20 item-routing notice, the May 22 release of the two responsive PDFs, and the June 1 closure communications that disposed of items 1, 2, and 4. Per the NextRequest portal display, she is listed as "Staff" on each message; the formal "Point of contact" field for the request names a different staff member (Tanisha Pattillo), suggesting Knox handles the day-to-day FOIA-portal correspondence while Pattillo holds the records-coordinator role. ## Role and affiliations PCSO records / NextRequest portal staff. Knox is the substantive front-line FOIA-correspondence author for `#26-808`. She is distinct from the May 19 email reply that came from `[email protected]` (group address; sender unnamed) and from Sheriff Higgins, whose name appears only on the original recipient line. ## Appearances in the corpus - [[_overview]] (PCSO `#26-808` production overview) — Knox authored: - **2026-05-20 14:13 CDT** — portal message disposing items 1 (referred to Pulaski County Government Purchasing Department, 501-340-8305), 2 (IT Dept processing), and 3 (CID processing) - **2026-05-22 15:46 CDT** — release of the two responsive PDFs (item 3 production) - **2026-06-01 16:21 CDT** — two portal messages closing the request: item 1 referral upgraded to `pulaskicountygovernment.nextrequest.com`; item 2 closed as "no records found" after PCSO IT search; item 4 closed as "no records of the asset-forfeiture-fund records authorizing the PCSO Flock procurement" after a 2015-present search by PCSO Finance ## Notes The 6/1 closing messages — drafted under Knox's authorship — collectively dispose of three of four request items via referral-or-no-records. The item-2 "no records" certification is the most consequential and the most contestable on its face given PCSO's operational footprint; the production overview's open-follow-ups section ([[_overview]]) raises the segregability question (§ 25-19-105(f)) about whether the PCSO IT search reached a Flock-administrator inbox.