# Bentonville Parks Contracts and Current Inventory Reconciliation The second and third rolling packages document three Parks camera transactions and a current eighteen-site native video inventory. They do not provide a device-by-device lifecycle ledger tying every order line to a current, removed, replaced, or superseded site. ## Contract and payment chains | Transaction | Documentary terms | Finance chain | |---|---|---| | Original Parks deployment | 16 Condor PTZs; `$56,040` year one; `$48,000` recurring; 30-day retention | PO `22403431`; invoice `INV-60724`; check `254116` for `$56,040` | | Expansion | 5 PTZ cameras; PO amount `$18,750`; invoice later reduced by a `$5,000` installation-delay concession | PO `22501643`; invoice `INV-61487`; check `257447` for `$14,106.25` | | Original deployment renewal | 16-camera annual renewal | PO `22506068`; invoice `INV-77997`; check `259675`, each `$48,000` | | Later executed arrangement | 6 PTZ cameras; 12-month initial term; 24-month renewal; `$18,000` recurring; `$4,500` implementation; `$22,500` year-one subtotal; `$427.50` estimated tax | `Completed Flock Contract - Updated.pdf`, p. 4; PO `22601327`, dated 2026-03-06 | The original sixteen- and five-camera terms are anchored in [[Bentonville Parks Flock Condor Contracts 2024-2025]]. The checks, invoices, and purchase orders are compiled at [[Bentonville Flock Finance Records]]. The later six-camera form says `"Initial Term: 12 Months"`, `"Renewal Term: 24 Months"`, and lists six `"Flock Safety Video Camera PTZ w/ LTE Service, fka Condor"` units (`Completed Flock Contract - Updated.pdf`, p. 4). The record does not say that this form superseded the earlier five-camera expansion. ## Current inventory `Native Camera - Location Data.csv` contains eighteen `"Video Camera"` rows under `"Bentonville Parks AR (Condor)"`, each marked `"Healthy"`. Eighteen paired `"Compute Box"` rows repeat the same coordinates and do not increase the camera-site count ([[Bentonville Native Camera Inventory and Deployment Tracker]]). > [!contradiction] > The executed record contains sixteen-, five-, and later six-camera quantities, while the dated native export contains eighteen video-camera sites. No produced document supplies the additions, removals, replacements, consolidation, or supersession history needed to reconcile those numbers ([[T053 - Bentonville Ordered PTZ Quantities vs Current Eighteen-Site Inventory]]). ## Evidence boundary An executed order or paid invoice proves an authorized and paid transaction. A current native export proves a dated inventory representation. Neither class, alone, proves that every ordered unit became a separate presently operating camera or explains what happened to a unit absent from the current export.