# Conway Asset Forfeiture Log 2023-2026 `Jan 2023 - Present Asset Forfeiture Accounting.pdf` is a four-page “Asset Forfeiture Log” covering February 13, 2023 through June 23, 2026. Pages 1-2 print the Date, From, To, Justification, and Amount columns. Pages 3-4 are the horizontally overflowed running-balance column for those same rows; the balance pages do not repeat dates or descriptions. The file is an internally formatted schedule, not a system-generated general-ledger report, and the production supplies no native spreadsheet. ## Inflow sources recorded | Source label in the record | Examples | Evidence | |---|---|---| | 20th District checks | Repeated checks from 2023 through 2026, including check references and amounts | pp. 1-2: repeated “Check from the 20th District” / “20th District Check” descriptions, including `$1,192.80` and `$33,213.60`. Financial-instrument reference numbers are not republished. | | DEA wires | Multiple entries carrying DEA-style references | pp. 1-2: repeated “Wire from DEA” descriptions, including `$1,873.63`, `$32,068.73`, and `$2,866.50`. Transfer references are not republished. | | USPS check | One identified check | p. 1: “USPS Check” `$31,735.74`. The check number is not republished. | | Interest and balance updates | Monthly/periodic interest descriptions plus several unlabeled audit/balance updates | p. 1: “July Per Finance Interest deposit” `$3,137.38`; “Interest payments Jan-July and adjustments” `$18,918.31`; “Updated Balance 01/27/25” with no stated amount. | The labels establish source categories and posting references for many entries. They do not establish the underlying seizure, investigation, case, or statutory basis for a particular transfer. ## Surveillance and technology spending recorded | Date | Verbatim schedule description | Amount | Evidentiary boundary | |---|---|---:|---| | 2024-07-25 | “Drone package from Skydio” | `-$57,962.71` | Establishes the schedule's recording of a [[Skydio]] drone-package allocation; it does not identify model, quantity, invoice, payee account, or payment date. | | 2025-01-14 | “O-25-09 Flock Safety Cameras” | `-$180,000.00` | Matches the ordinance authorization amount but precedes the two documented cash payments. | | 2026-01-27 | “Axon annual payment O-26-11” | `-$52,714.52` | Establishes an annual Axon line in this schedule; the product and underlying contract are not identified. | All three rows appear verbatim on page 1 of the produced PDF. The same schedule also records non-surveillance or mixed-purpose law-enforcement spending, including two K9s and equipment (`-$61,782.47`), e-bikes (`-$22,698.30`), uniform badges (`-$9,594.75`), a range increase (`-$10,000.00`), a field-force-bus air conditioner (`-$3,365.17`), a multi-purpose-room upgrade (`-$55,193.54` plus `-$543.74`), M-ATV work (`-$18,097.45`), and PepperBall equipment/training (`-$5,022.16` combined) (pp. 1-2, verbatim schedule rows). ## Running-balance construction and gaps - Page 1's `8/7/2023 — Adjustment-Audit` row has no amount, while the row-aligned page-3 balances move from `$605,111.28` to `$606,304.01`, an implied `$1,192.73` change. - Page 1's `3/28/2024 — Updated Audit 03/28/24` row has no amount, while the page-3 balance moves from `$648,126.25` to `$654,191.78`, an implied `$6,065.53` change. - Page 1 includes further “Updated Balance” or interest-update rows without amounts. Pages 3-4 change at those rows, but the PDF does not label the running-balance column or disclose formulas. - The printed order is not consistently chronological: for example, the 2026 page begins with January 27 entries before page 2 lists a January 21 receipt. This does not change the arithmetic total but reinforces that the document should not be treated as a native chronological GL export. The implied amounts above are arithmetic observations from the visually row-aligned pages, not amounts printed in the Amount column. > [!contradiction] Schedule-date accounting versus cash-payment evidence > The schedule records `1/14/2025 — O-25-09 Flock Safety Cameras — -$180,000.00` (`Jan 2023 - Present Asset Forfeiture Accounting.pdf`, p. 1). The produced cash-account trial balances instead record a `$60,000.00` AP credit on 2025-07-09 and a `$120,000.00` AP credit on 2026-01-16 (`Dunlap FOIA request_July 2025 TB showing first install pmt.pdf`, p. 1; `Dunlap FOIA request_Jan 2026 TB showing final install pmt.pdf`, p. 1). The previously produced City vouchers identify those same-dated amounts as “Flock safety falcon cameras, first installment” and “Final payment for camera system” (`FOIA-2026-125/PO 97136.pdf`, p. 1; `FOIA-2026-125/PO 00151.pdf`, p. 1). The records can coexist if the January schedule line is an appropriation, encumbrance, or available-balance reservation rather than cash, but the production does not define it. See [[T018 - Conway Asset Forfeiture Schedule vs Cash Ledger]]. ## People and organizations mentioned - [[City of Conway]] and [[Conway Police Department]] — fund/account and spending context. - [[20th District]] — recurring check-source label. - [[Drug Enforcement Administration]] — recurring wire-source label. - [[United States Postal Service]] — one check-source label. - [[Flock Safety, Inc.]], [[Skydio]], and [[Axon Enterprise, Inc.]] — technology vendors named in spending descriptions. ## Concepts invoked - [[Asset-Forfeiture Funding for Surveillance Procurement]] ## Events documented - [[2024-07 Conway Asset Forfeiture Log Records Skydio Drone Package]] - [[2025-01 Conway City Council Authorizes Flock Purchase (Ordinance O-25-09)]] - [[2026-01 Conway Asset Forfeiture Log Records Axon Annual Payment]] ## Cross-references - [[Conway Asset Forfeiture Annual Statements 2023-2025]] - [[Conway Flock Payment Trial Balances]] - [[Flock Payment Records — INV-56859 and INV-81961]] ## Open questions / follow-ups - What does the running-balance column represent: cash, available fund balance, appropriated balance, encumbered balance, or an internally adjusted management figure? - What amounts and posting references underlie each blank “Updated Audit/Balance” row? - Does the source spreadsheet or City GL contain omitted columns, formulas, or case/source identifiers?