# Aggregate Usage Status and Policy Request Chain This twelve-page Word file preserves request 736 for aggregate usage statistics and system uptime/status logs, CPD's response, request 763 for the statutory practice-and-usage data, public policies, status records, and an exemption index, and a response dated July 22. It records both promised production categories and categorical withholdings; no underlying report, policy, export, or status log is included in this file. ## Key takeaways - **CPD says completed public reports and existing non-exempt aggregates will be produced.** The response to 736 says the Department "will provide any completed public practice-and-usage reports" and existing non-exempt aggregate or summary records, to the extent they exist and have not already been provided (`FOIA Chain 736 and 763 Chain-Connor.docx`, p. 3). - **Underlying platform and status records are withheld.** Pages 3-5 withhold alerts, search/audit/access logs, camera-specific statistics, and uptime, device-health, diagnostic, outage, performance, maintenance, and similar records under the ALPR provisions, computer-security exemption, and conditionally the investigation exemption. - **Request 763 asks directly for the statutory reports and public policies.** It invokes § 12-12-1805's compilation, preservation, and public-policy duties and asks for a written statement if the records do not exist (pp. 6-7). - **The response promises reports and policies if located.** It says completed practice-and-usage records and responsive policies will be produced to the extent they exist and have not already been provided (pp. 8-9, 11-12). - **CPD rejects a field-by-field index.** It says the FOIA does not require creation of "a new field-by-field index, privilege log, or litigation-style Vaughn index" for records withheld in full (p. 11). - **The file is not the promised production.** Its conclusion again promises completed reports and policies and maintains denial of the underlying platform records (p. 12); it contains no separate report or policy attachment. ## Cross-references - [[City Attorney Review of ALPR Records Requests]] - Finkenbinder's later analysis that requests 760-763 did not appear to seek protected captured-plate data and that § 25-19-105(b)(11) did not appear to apply. - [[LPR Report First Half 2025]] - Conway's previously produced statutory report. - [[CPD Policy 800-32 — License Plate Reader Vehicle Operations]] - Conway's previously produced ALPR policy. - [[T046 - Conway City Attorney Disclosure Advice vs CPD Categorical ALPR Audit Withholding]]. ## Open questions / follow-ups - Which completed practice-and-usage reports or additional policy records were located and produced. - Whether any existing aggregate usage or uptime/status record was produced after legal review. - Whether the response was transmitted in this form or revised.