# Jonesboro Access to Craighead County Avigilon `JPD County Avigilon Access.pdf` identifies a County-to-City video-access arrangement. Page 1 lists exterior Avigilon cameras accessible by the City of Jonesboro; pages 2–3 list JPD personnel with recorded-video access. ## Camera access The first page is headed `"Cameras Accesable by COJ"` and states `"Connection Type: Site-Site VPN"`. It contains 31 `AVIGILON` rows: | Produced facility grouping | Camera rows | |---|---:| | Courthouse East Exterior | 4 | | Annex Central Exterior | 2 | | Annex West Exterior | 16 | | Old KBTM Building Exterior | 3 | | Elections Annex | 5 | | Highway Department | 1 | | **Total** | **31** | Source: `JPD County Avigilon Access.pdf`, p. 1, device and location table. The source supplies device names and models but no coordinates, installation dates, operational status, or view/use history. ## Recorded-video users Pages 2–3 are headed `"Craighead County Avigilon/ JPD Recorded Video Access List"` and define the scope as `"EXTERIOR cameras of all facilites within the city limits of Jonesboro excluding the Detention Center/ Sheriff's Office"`. The list contains 32 rows; every row identifies department `JPD`, title `Officer`, and access level `"JPD Shared Exterior"` (`JPD County Avigilon Access.pdf`, pp. 2–3). The record establishes configured account access, not that every listed account is currently active or that any listed officer viewed, downloaded, or disseminated video. ## Relationship to JPD's prior inventory JPD's July production lists `"Craighead County Avigilon — 26 views"` ([[Jonesboro Camera and Views Inventory]], `Camera Locations.xlsx`, `"Cameras and Views"`). This County file lists 31 accessible camera rows. Neither record is dated on its face, and neither defines whether `views` and camera rows are equivalent, so the five-row difference is preserved rather than forced into a current-count conclusion. The file supplies concrete third-party evidence of the cross-government camera and user scope discussed at [[T020 - Jonesboro Shared-Camera Documentation Statement vs Inventory Entries]]. It does not by itself establish which copies or audit records JPD maintains. ## Open questions / follow-ups - Effective date, authorizing MOU or agreement, approval chain, and administrator for the VPN and `JPD Shared Exterior` role. - Current account status, permission granularity, and retained login/view/download/export audit records. - Whether JPD's Policy 715.02 user-list, written-request, and access-documentation duties are satisfied through this County-maintained list or separate City records.