# ACIN AI Fact Sheet This two-page public fact sheet is the batch's clearest description of ACIN's artificial-intelligence functions and its preferred governance framing. It says AI supports cross-jurisdiction pattern and relationship detection under human control, while denying that ACIN uses AI for predictive policing, mass surveillance, social scoring, dossiers, or autonomous enforcement decisions. ## Key takeaways - ACIN says its AI helps agencies "identify patterns, connect related incidents, and improve investigative efficiency across jurisdictions" (p. 1). - The listed functions include identifying related incidents, detecting trends, and locating "possible connections between people, vehicles, locations, and events" (p. 1). - The document says AI "does not make arrests, charging decisions, or operational decisions" and that every investigative decision remains human-controlled (p. 1). - ACIN claims formal written AI governance policies, complete user-activity logging and monitoring, pre-access operational/CJIS training, and annual training requirements (pp. 1-2, "All user activity within ACIN is logged, monitored, and subject to audit review"). No underlying policy, log, or training record is included. - The document says ACIN AI is not "A predictive policing system targeting innocent citizens," "A mass surveillance platform," or "A system for collecting intelligence dossiers on citizens" (p. 1). - The named frameworks include FBI CJIS policy, Arkansas privacy/public-records laws, federal standards, NIST frameworks, and DOJ guidance (p. 2). It does not identify particular NIST or DOJ publications. ## Cross-references - [[Arkansas Criminal Intelligence Network]] - [[Law-Enforcement AI-Assisted Analytics]] - [[T014 - ACIN Analytical Reach vs Non-Surveillance Classification]] - [[CJIS Compliance]]