# ACIN Final Package Overview On 2026-07-24, the [[Sixth Judicial District Prosecuting Attorney's Office]] delivered this final package in response to Joshua's request for grant, participation-agreement, procurement, governance, budget, staffing, and status records concerning the [[Arkansas Criminal Intelligence Network]]. Casey Clark's transmittal says the response is complete for records located and maintained as of 2026-07-21 and separately states that the federal funding and dollar amounts remained proposed because DOJ had not issued an award package or approved a final budget as of 2026-07-23 (Gmail message `19f93fc1866e1bee`, thread linked in frontmatter). The downloaded archive, `OneDrive_2026-07-26.zip`, is 259,296,346 bytes with SHA-256 `424564305b579b80b3cde7ef6f74a52f4ede9e692e303a7667d51d957996f446`. Its expanded production tree contains **83 files totaling 259,274,368 bytes**: 78 PDFs, two DOCX files, one EML, one PNG, and one nested ZIP. The 78 PDFs contain 891 produced pages; after byte-identical document copies are counted once, the package contains 710 unique PDF pages. ## What's inside | Produced group | Files | Source-page routing | |---|---:|---| | Root | 1 | `ACIN Media Package.zip`, an exact copy of the already-ingested first batch | | `Agreements` | 38 | [[ACIN Agreements and Participation Terms]] | | `Briefing-Reports` | 18 | [[ACIN Origin and Project Evolution]], [[ACIN Participant and Integration Status]], [[ACIN Policy and Operations Manual]], [[ACIN Governance Board and Controlled Repository]], [[ACIN AI Policy and CLEST Training Packet]], [[ACIN Proposed Federal Grant and Budget]] | | `Budget (Not Approved))` | 8 | [[ACIN Proposed Federal Grant and Budget]] | | `Finacial-Quotes-Contracts- Historical` | 10 | [[Peregrine and Carahsoft Executed Contract]], [[LeadsOnline Executed Contract]], [[ACIN Historical Quotes and Proposals]], [[ACIN Public Communications Graphic]] | | `Governance` | 8 | [[ACIN Governance Board and Controlled Repository]], [[ACIN AI Policy and CLEST Training Packet]] | The nested `ACIN Media Package.zip` has SHA-256 `0a1c2dc67d0887357dba2c37e920d3e9ce0e8ae3557a17b721899c78e38faa2e`, exactly matching the archive behind [[pulaski-county-prosecutor/2026-07-21-acin-media-package-batch-1/_overview|ACIN Media Package - Batch 1 Overview]]. It is retained as produced provenance and is not treated as a second seven-document production. ## Exact duplicates Three PDF pairs occur at separate produced paths but are byte-identical: | SHA-256 | First path | Duplicate path | |---|---|---| | `0d9625eb61b341e51464c6869aa021caca8d045424f06ae3436f9db1ea4786a7` | `Briefing-Reports/GOV-101_ACIN_Evaluation_Framework_and_KPIs_2026-04-08.pdf` | `Governance/GOV-101_ACIN_Evaluation_Framework_and_KPIs_2026-04-08.pdf` | | `2e474cd34e78200f2bf0253a75357689f22daa38cd334ce992f2115de23b1f5a` | `Briefing-Reports/GOV-102_ACIN_Governance_Board_Kickoff_Packet_2026-04.pdf` | `Governance/GOV-102_ACIN_Governance_Board_Kickoff_Packet_2026-04.pdf` | | `8e0eac86596a87600d61f3a594f7db5a55e452011c020603791d2e34f3d5770b` | `Briefing-Reports/GRN-101_Combined_ACIN_Master_Grant_REDACTED.pdf` | `Budget (Not Approved))/GRN-101_Combined_ACIN_Master_Grant_REDACTED.pdf` | The two Atlas One quote PDFs are not byte-identical, but their extracted text is identical; see [[ACIN Historical Quotes and Proposals]]. ## Request-category assessment | Requested category | Production coverage | Evidentiary boundary | |---|---|---| | Federal applications, awards, agreements, budgets, and congressional designation | Application packages, a proposed budget, clearinghouse correspondence, a Senate CDS table, and a compiled grant binder | No DOJ award package or approved final budget; the state form says to complete it only after approval | | MOUs, interlocal, and participation agreements | 38 agreement PDFs involving 27 named agency units | Produced filenames, signatures, and a project status table do not form one internally consistent final roster | | Solicitations, selected proposals, evaluations, awards, and vendor contracts | Executed Peregrine/Carahsoft and LeadsOnline packages plus historical LexisNexis and Atlas One quotes | No invoice, payment, funding-availability notice, kickoff record, acceptance record, or completed integration export | | Governance, retention, access, audit, acceptable use, sharing, and privacy | An 87-page manual, MOU forms, kickoff packet, bylaws, security/privacy policies, AI materials, and repository indexes | The documents conflict about data scope, board authority, approval timing, composition, and retention hierarchy | | Budgets, staffing, status, progress, and briefings | Proposed staffing/budget, 2025 and 2026 status reports, a July 2026 agency table, work plan, and briefings | Project-authored status labels are not proof that a vendor was paid or that an integration became operational | ## Controlling findings - **Federal funding remained unawarded.** The proposed request is $5,464,816, but the clearinghouse email says to complete the award form only "[w]hen funds are received" and to disregard it otherwise; the final custodian email confirms that no DOJ award package or approved budget existed ([[ACIN Proposed Federal Grant and Budget]], `GRN-201_State_Clearinghouse_Signoff_Email_REDACTED_2026-07-06.eml`, plain-text body; Gmail message `19f93fc1866e1bee`). See [[T029 - ACIN Funding Obtained Language vs No Federal Award]]. - **Two vendor packages were executed, with performance still funding-contingent.** The $3 million Peregrine/Carahsoft quote requires written notice that funds are available before kickoff and payment ([[Peregrine and Carahsoft Executed Contract]], `CON-002_Peregrine_Carahsoft_Executed_Contract_2026-03-17.pdf`, p. 3). The LeadsOnline state signature certifies that no obligation will be incurred without sufficient funds ([[LeadsOnline Executed Contract]], `CON-001_LeadsOnline_Executed_Contract_2026-07-13.pdf`, p. 7). - **The operative data scope is unresolved.** The standard ACIN MOU says "ONLY INCIDENT REPORT INFORMATION" and excludes investigative files, while a security policy expressly identifies "Case notes, attachments, and suspect associations" as investigative data and the LeadsOnline package provides narrative, phone-extraction, communications, movement, and location analysis ([[ACIN Agreements and Participation Terms]], `AGR-201_El_Dorado_PD_MOU_EXECUTED_2026-05-15.pdf`, p. 1; [[ACIN Policy and Operations Manual]], `POL-301_ACIN_Policy_and_Operations_Manual_REDACTED_2026-01.pdf`, p. 47; [[LeadsOnline Executed Contract]], `CON-001_LeadsOnline_Executed_Contract_2026-07-13.pdf`, pp. 15-17, 46-47). See [[T030 - ACIN Incident-Report-Only Scope vs Investigative Data Services]]. - **Governance documents do not establish one settled board model.** The January manual claims board review and approval, the April kickoff packet calls the initial group informal and places formal governance after September 2026, and the MOU, cooperation agreement, and bylaws describe different membership structures ([[ACIN Governance Board and Controlled Repository]]). See [[T031 - ACIN Board Approval Claims vs Future Formal Governance]]. - **Participant records drift.** The Peregrine scope, July status table, produced agreements, and signature labels differ. El Dorado's MOU carries a May execution but the July status table says "Not Signed" ([[ACIN Agreements and Participation Terms]], `AGR-201_El_Dorado_PD_MOU_EXECUTED_2026-05-15.pdf`, signature page; [[ACIN Participant and Integration Status]], `STS-301_ACIN_Agency_Status_2026-07-15.pdf`, p. 1). See [[T032 - ACIN Participation Rosters and Agreement Status]]. - **The final package deepens the preexisting classification tension.** Executed contracts add geospatial, link, temporal, phone, movement, LPR-hit, and case-narrative capabilities to ACIN's earlier non-surveillance framing. See [[T014 - ACIN Analytical Reach vs Non-Surveillance Classification]]. ## People and organizations - [[Casey P. Clark]] — author, project executive, contract and application representative. - [[Kelly Ward]] — Chief Deputy Prosecuting Attorney whom the project-origin report identifies as initiating the 2023 discussion. - [[Will Jones]] — Prosecuting Attorney named in the January 2024 concept presentation. - [[Heath Helton]] — LRPD Chief who received the initial concept. - [[Peregrine Technologies, Inc.]], [[Carahsoft Technology Corp.]], and [[LeadsOnline]] — contracted platform, reseller, and investigative-services vendors. - [[ACIN Oversight and Governance Board]] — governing body described inconsistently across the package. - [[Arkansas Office of State Technology]] and [[Arkansas Commission on Law Enforcement Standards and Training]] — state-policy and training bodies invoked in ACIN materials. ## Open questions / follow-ups - Did DOJ later issue an award, approve a final budget, or authorize expenditure? - Did ACIN send the contractually required funding-availability notice, hold a kickoff, issue purchase orders, receive invoices, make payment, or accept an integration? - Which of the produced agreements are legally operative, and what is the current signed/data-contributing/access-only roster? - Which data fields and source systems are actually loaded, and does the implemented scope include investigative narratives, attachments, phone extractions, or other non-incident material? - Which board or advisory body approved each policy, on what date, with what roster, vote, minutes, and delegated authority? - Where are the controlled-repository documents listed but not separately produced, including the playbook and strategic plan?