# PD-2026-520 Request Coverage and Custodian Statements This page reconciles Sherwood's July 15-16 status and completion messages with the five produced PDFs. Correspondence remains in Gmail; it is not copied into raw. ## Item-by-item coverage | Request item | Coverage | Evidence-bound finding | |---:|---|---| | 1 — incident-specific Flock alert/audit record | **Unanswered** | The July 16 substantive-status thread said confirmation was still pending for items 1 and 2. The request was then closed, but neither completion message answers item 1, and none of the five PDFs contains incident 2026-006181 or an alert/audit record. ([status thread](https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#all/19f677440255f137); [completion thread](https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#all/19f6babcf24df06f)) | | 2 — Flock audit/activity records associated with the alert or incident | **Unanswered** | Same closure sequence and file review. No category-specific no-records statement, search description, or activity export was supplied. | | 3 — sharing/configuration records | **Incomplete / custodian-specific no-native-report response** | Sherwood said it “does not maintain a report or record of configuration files.” That wording does not establish that no responsive Shared Networks export, access list, hot-list setting, retention setting, or configuration-history record exists in any system or custodian's possession; it may mean only that no single preformatted report exists. ([completion thread](https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#all/19f6babcf24df06f)) | | 4 — policies in effect on February 11 | **Partial** | Three in-effect general orders were produced, plus successor ALPR Policy 11.08.00. The completion correspondence states the ALPR policy was not implemented until March 24, 2026. The production does not explicitly confirm that General Orders 10.02.00, 10.09.00, 10.11.00, and 09.01.00 exhaust all six requested policy subparts. | | 5 — written supervisory/administrative review records | **Custodian-specific no-records statement** | Sherwood said the Captain Edwards email released in PD-2026-502 is all it has and there are no other records. That closes only the written-record category in the responding custodian's possession; it does not convert the undocumented review into a produced memo. ([status thread](https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#all/19f677440255f137)) | ## Why the successor policy matters without retroactive application Policy 11.08.00 requires an officer to “log the outcome of the hit/alert,” states that “All system activity is logged and subject to review,” and provides for annual audits (`3677700.pdf`, pp. 3-4). Those clauses identify record types and system functions that exist after March 24, 2026. They do not prove that the same records existed on February 11, and they do not answer items 1 or 2. ## Remaining production questions - Which systems, accounts, and custodians were searched for items 1-3? - Does the configuration statement deny all responsive records or only a preformatted “report”? - Do the four in-effect general orders constitute the complete item-4 response across subparts (a)-(f)? - Is the item-5 statement limited to the FOIA coordinator's files, Captain Edwards's files, or all Department custodians?