# T050 - Bryant ARDOT Saline Permit vs Pulaski and Lonoke County Language The Permit 1899 letter contains internally inconsistent county fields. Its permit title, section line, and coordinates point to Bryant/Saline County, while two prose clauses name Pulaski and Lonoke counties. ## Statement A The letter identifies Permit 1899, Bryant, seven Bryant-area coordinates, and: > `"Section 1 - Saline County"` (`AR DOT - Signed.pdf`, p. 1; [[Bryant Flock Locations and ARDOT Permit 1899]].) ## Statement B The same letter says the right-of-way is: > `"in Pulaski County"` and future maintenance will be performed: > `"in Lonoke County"` (`AR DOT - Signed.pdf`, pp. 1-2.) ## Why it matters County fields identify jurisdiction, maintenance responsibility, and the permit's geographic scope. The plan coordinates should not be reassigned away from Bryant on the basis of unexplained boilerplate, but the contradictory language should not be silently corrected. ## Resolution status `open` - no corrected letter, permit amendment, agency explanation, or county crosswalk resolves the prose. ## Discovery The conflict surfaced during the 2026-08-06 Bryant Request 26-371 compilation.