# T051 - Flock Person-Detection Sole-Source Claim vs No-People Pitch Claim Two Flock-authored pages in Bryant's production describe people-detection capability in opposite ways. The conflict is a vendor-framing tension, not evidence that Bryant enabled a particular feature. ## Statement A Flock's April 14, 2025 sole-source letter says its machine vision can: > `"detect persons, animals, vehicles, and other cars"` and later references object detection including `"people"` (`Sole Source Letter Flock 2025.pdf`, p. 1; [[Bryant Flock Procurement Contract and Payment]]). ## Statement B A Flock pitch page embedded in the April budget packet says: > `"No people"` > `"No facial recognition"` (`resolution_2025-17_budget_adjustment_april_2025.pdf`, Flock pitch-deck page.) ## Why it matters The statements may refer to different products, feature scopes, or rhetorical contexts. Reading either as a universal technical fact would overstate the record. ## Resolution status `open` - the production lacks a product/SKU crosswalk, enabled-feature export, technical definition, or Bryant configuration record explaining the difference. ## Discovery The conflict surfaced during the 2026-08-06 Bryant Request 26-371 compilation. ## Notes Neither vendor statement independently proves that Bryant purchased, enabled, or used people detection.